Purchase Flomax Pharmacy Rx On Line > Order NOW
<meta name="robots" content="all">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us">
<meta name="description" content="Purchase Flomax Pharmacy Rx On Line - This is the character of Big Pharma With approximately 600,000 physicians i Purchase Flomax Pharmacy Rx On Line n active practice this amounts to more than $30,000 spent on each physician Purchase Flomax Pharmacy Rx On Line">
<body style="margin:0px;padding:0px;width:100%;height:100%"><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.jeremyforlabour.com/" style="padding: 5px 10px;">UK Casinos Not On Gamstop</a><a href="https://www.jakobus-info.de/" style="padding: 5px 10px;">Beste Online Casino Deutschland</a></div>
<div align="center">
<b>| Purchase Flomax Pharmacy Rx On Line | By intimidating the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) into approving record numbers of me-too drugs (drugs that offer no significant benefit over drugs already on the market) that often have dangerous adverse effects and by spending well in excess of $12 billion a year to promote drugs, using advertising and promotional tricks that push at or through the envelope of being false and misleading, this industry has been extremely successful in distorting, in a profitable but dangerous way, the rational processes for approving and prescribing drugs. | Strand looks at these high figures and poses the question: "Why. <a href="/">Cheap Depakote Online</a> | Merck spent $160. | Morrison writes that "Pfizer alone has 4,500 people in its sales force," but these employees' salaries are small change compared to the increased revenue they encourage. <b>
<table width="100%" border="0">
<tr>
<td>
<center>
<p>
<a href="/">Tramadol Roses Online</a>
The remainder of the spending increase came from 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise, or advertised very little. As a result, niacin does not enjoy the intensive advertising that the HMG CoA reductase inhibitors and gemfibrozil enjoy. You'd think that after recent disasters with Baycol, Rezulin, Lotronex, Duract, Redux and Fen-Phen, doctors would learn, but they keep prescribing new drugs like Clarinex, Nexium, and Bextra at greater risk and cost.
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 344
Recently, pharmaceutical companies have launched an even cleverer plan. <br>
Organized medicine, simply put, is one giant money-making sham based on junk science. CONSUMER REPORTS discussed this issue at length in two articles which ran concurrently in the February and March 1992 issues entitled "Pushing Drugs to Doctors" and "Miracle Drugs or Media Drugs. Yet, according to a study conducted at the University of California and published in The Wall Street Journal, 60% of the pharmaceutical ads from medical journals violated FDA guidelines. For the study, Wilkes' group asked medical experts to review 109 advertisements from the country's ten leading medical journals. <br>
Take, for example, a Paxil commercial that was recently popular. With approximately 600,000 physicians in active practice this amounts to more than $30,000 spent on each physician. Then, in 1981, the drug industry proposed that the FDA allow advertising directly to consumers, arguing that the public should not be denied access to the "knowledge" that would be provided by such marketing. Gary Null's Prescription For Disaster video documentary, which is available at the Gary Null website and is a must-see video for anyone who wants to know the truth about the pharmaceutical industry and the FDA. Within the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research about 80 percent of the resources are geared towards the approval of new drugs and 20 percent is for everything else.
</p>
<p>
That's a good question with a simple answer. That's because nutritional supplements, based on vitamins, minerals, herbs, and natural substances such as MSM, are not patentable. <br>
Natural herbs and foods as well as medications that can no longer be patented won't be "pushed" in advertising because there's no real money to be made on them.
Attaining Medical Self Efficiency An Informed Citizens Guide by Duncan Long, page 13
The cheap-but-effective medications that can't be patented are also kept out of the limelight by the big companies paying for advertising and the mass media intent on making money through advertising. With an advertising budget greater than that of Budweiser beer or Coca-Cola, Claritin took off: sales grew from $1. <br>
<a href="/">Phentermine C O D Mastercard</a>
The researchers are happy, their universities and institutes have obtained more money for their impressive advances, the industry is bulging with profits and the patients are dying. I think I need Zoloft.s just as easily as they can sway the rest of us.
Aids A Second Opinion by Gary Null PhD with James Feast, page 200
Back in the World War II era, it was the same for tobacco.
Prozac Backlash by Joseph Glenmullen MD, page 232
For years the pharmaceutical industry was allowed to market its drugs only to doctors.
</p>
<p>
We've just seen the tip of the iceberg here. The commercial demonstrates the symptoms for depression and the consumer identifies with them.
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 48
Such results can be reported by medical journalists—which are also hired by these PR firms—in unsuspecting medical journals. <br>
No, that isn't the plot of a new children's movie. That's a good question with a simple answer.
Ephedra Fact And Fiction by Mike Fillon, page 178
Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent by pharmaceutical companies to research and then advertise their patented medical drugs to physicians and consumers. And they seem to promise everything. To the PDR, to drug company representatives who make the rounds of doctors' offices, and to advertising in medical journals. <br>
You either play the game as a drug researcher and produce the results your employer wants, or you start looking for a new job. The role of the U.
</p>
</center>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</b></b></div>
</body>