Phentermine 37.5 Online Prescriptions - Low Drugstore
<meta name="robots" content="all"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en-us"/>
<meta name="description" content="Phentermine 37.5 Online Prescriptions - Suzanne and Robert Fletcher, published a study sharply critical of the pharmaceutical industry, pharmaceutical advertising i Phentermine 37.5 Online Prescriptions n the journal declined substantially, and remained lower than usual for months thereafter Drug safety is about five percent Phentermine 37.5 Online Prescriptions"/>
</head>
<body style="margin:0px;padding:0px;width:100%;height:100%">
<div align="center">
<b>| Phentermine 37.5 Online Prescriptions | Since then, pharmaceutical advertising has grown to an entirely new, pop culture-savvy level. | Drug companies also engage in misleading advertising campaigns which make outright false or unrealistic claims, but which convince that vast majority of the public that most or all prescription drugs are not only safe, but the key to better health and a better life. <a href="/">Phentermine Buy</a> |
The experts speak on pharmaceutical advertising:
In the pharmaceutical area, DTC advertising has been increasing in the late 1990s at a rate of around 30 percent compounded annually. | Yet, the medication information offered by these drug-company-supported sources is often biased, incomplete, and sometimes inaccurate. <b>
<table width="100%" border="0">
<tr>
<td>
<center>
<p>
<a href="/">Bblog By Century Phentermine Popl</a>
5 billion figure for consumer ads is concentrated on a relatively small handful of medications.D.S. “I would argue that the FDA as currently configured is incapable of protecting America against another Vioxx. Drug safety is about five percent. <br>
Innocent Casualties by Elaine Feuer, page 73
Direct-to-consumer marketing increased 30 percent in 1998 alone., page 93
In effect, the publication is more a paid advertisement for industry than a publication of a learned medical society. <br>
In Innocent Casualties, Elaine Feuer calls these advertisements "intentionally misleading" because they promote the pharmaceutical by "exaggerating a drug's benefits while downplaying its hazards in small print in the addendum. Drug companies who make huge profits from the sale of drugs spend more than $10 billion a year promoting drugs, and spend next to nothing warning the public about potential risks. Suddenly it became a normal part of our everyday experience to be confronted with the idea that we or a loved one might be suffering from ED (erectile dysfunction, for those not in the know), arthritis pain, high cholesterol, nasal congestion, osteoporosis, heartburn, or even the heartbreak of toenail fungus.
</p>
<p>
After all, you can obtain prescriptions only through a doctor. According to these guidelines, drug companies can fulfill their obligations for informing consumers about prescription drugs by referring in advertisements to four sources of additional information: their doctor, a toll-free number, a magazine or newspaper ad and a website. <br>
, page 93
In effect, the publication is more a paid advertisement for industry than a publication of a learned medical society. Unfortunately, that is the way the FDA is currently structured. <br>
<a href="/">Acid Reflux Effexor</a>
It's more than a coincidence that many of the most expensive medications happen to be those medications that are most heavily advertised. Drug companies who make huge profits from the sale of drugs spend more than $10 billion a year promoting drugs, and spend next to nothing warning the public about potential risks. While TV ads for drugs do indeed list potential harmful side effects, the slickly produced ads gloss over them so fast, and with such finesse, it creates an overwhelming impression among the public that these potential dangers are all but nothing to worry about.
The Big Fix by Katharine Greider, page 172
The Kaiser Family Foundation reports that with thousands of drugs on the market, 60 percent of DTC spending in 2000 went to plug just twenty products.
</p>
<p>
" Why do pharmaceutical companies spend billions of dollars on direct-to-consumer advertising, when consumers can only obtain prescriptions for these drugs through a doctor. Some avidly read free pamphlets and journals sent to them by pharmaceutical companies. Then, in 1981, the drug industry proposed that the FDA allow advertising directly to consumers, arguing that the public should not be denied access to the "knowledge" that would be provided by such marketing. <br>
Pharmaceutical companies wouldn't spend billions of dollars on direct-to-consumer advertising if it didn't work. Most prescription drug commercials follow the same script progression: First, the commercial shows how bleak life was for a person or character before taking whatever prescription medicine the commercial is advertising. That's how pharmaceutical commercials really work. The generic drugs are often made by the same manufacturer as the name-brand medication — the extra price is in the packaging and advertising. It's only a small step from that to the adoption of an 'offense is the best defense' policy as marketing pressures intensify. <br>
6 billion in 2000.
Death By prescription by Ray D Strand, page 49
But, again, there is a problem.
</p>
</center>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>